All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche and sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte and Lilly. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Early rituximab vs watchful waiting in low-tumor-burden FL: Long-term results of a phase III trial

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Sep 18, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in follicular lymphoma.


 

Initial results of a phase III, randomized trial (NCT00112931) in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) treated with rituximab monotherapy vs watchful waiting demonstrated improved time to new treatment (TTNT) after a median follow-up of 4 years. Given the natural lengthy course of FL, the trial was further extended. Northend et al. published long-term results with a 15-year follow-up in The Lancet Hematology.

From October 15, 2004, to May 1, 2009, adult patients with asymptomatic, Stage 2–4, Grade 1–3a low-tumor-burden FL and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1 (N = 455) were randomly assigned to the rituximab induction (n = 82), rituximab maintenance (n = 190), or watchful waiting (n = 183) group. The primary endpoint was TTNT. The median follow-up was 14.7 years.

 

Key learnings

The median TTNT was NR, 14.8 years, and 5.6 years, while the proportion of patients not requiring new treatment at 15 years was 65%, 48%, and 34%, in the rituximab maintenance, induction, and watchful waiting groups, respectively. 

The rituximab induction and maintenance groups were less likely to initiate new treatment compared with the watchful waiting group (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38–0.80; p = 0.0019 and HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.26–0.50; p < 0.0001, respectively).

There were no differences in TT2NT, OS, cause-specific mortality, and high-grade transformation rates between the rituximab maintenance, induction, and watchful waiting groups.

Early rituximab monotherapy substantially delays the need for new treatment, offering a treatment option for patients with advanced-stage, asymptomatic low-tumor-burden FL, particularly in those who wish to delay or avoid chemotherapy. 

CI, confidence interval; FL, follicular lymphoma; HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; TT2NT, time to second new treatment; TTNT, time to new treatment.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In your experience, does lisocabtagene maraleucel offer a durable, potentially curative remission with a one-time infusion in second-line large B-cell lymphoma?