All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Nurix Therapeutics, Roche, Sobi, and Thermo Fisher Scientific and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

EC authorizes label expansion for venetoclax combinations in CLL

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Jun 2, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.


On May 29, 2026, the European Commission (EC) authorized a label expansion for venetoclax to include its use in combination with acalabrutinib ± obinutuzumab and in combination with ibrutinib for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).1

Authorization of the label expansion to include venetoclax in combination with acalabrutinib ± obinutuzumab was supported by results from the phase III AMPLIFY (NCT03836261) trial, in which venetoclax + acalabrutinib reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 35% vs chemoimmunotherapy in adult patients with previously untreated CLL without del(17p) or mutated TP53.1,2 The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached with acalabrutinib + venetoclax vs 47.6 months for chemoimmunotherapy.1,2 The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade with venetoclax + acalabrutinib were headache (35%), diarrhea (33%), musculoskeletal pain (25%), COVID-19 (21%), fatigue (18%), bruising (17%), rash (16%), and nausea (15%).1,2 

Authorization of the label expansion to include venetoclax in combination with ibrutinib was supported by results from the phase III GLOW (NCT03462719) and phase II CAPTIVATE (NCT02910583) trials. The GLOW trial evaluated venetoclax in combination with ibrutinib or chlorambucil + obinutuzumab in patients with previously untreated CLL.1,3 At 64 months follow-up, venetoclax + ibrutinib reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 73% compared with chlorambucil + obinutuzumab and resulted in a median PFS of 65 months vs 23 months.1,3 The safety profile of venetoclax + ibrutinib was consistent with the safety profile of venetoclax and ibrutinib alone.1,3 The CAPTIVATE trial evaluated minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided discontinuation and fixed-duration venetoclax + ibrutinib in patients with previously untreated CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).1 The combination demonstrated 5.5-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates of 66% and 97%, respectively.1,4 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

What is the primary reason you use bridging therapy in patients with DLBCL awaiting CAR T-cell therapy?