All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
In a recently published letter to the editor of Haematologica, Roopesh Kansara, from the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Canada, and colleagues reported the results of a retrospective study of the use of maintenance rituximab (MR) in newly diagnosed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) patients. The authors set out to understand the optimal treatment of Composite (COM) and Discordant (DIS) NHL patients, as typically they are excluded from published trials. Data used was from 43 patients treated for COM/DIS NHL with R-CHOP before the treatment policy changed in 2006, and 55 patients treated with R-CHOP followed by MR after 2006.
The authors concluded by stating that the addition of MR did not result in improved overall outcomes, or when comparing just COM or DIS patients. They also mentioned some issues with their study including a small sample size, differences in follow-up time, lack of standardized imaging, lack of cytogenetic marker status being captured, and differences in baseline characteristics between groups such as age. Further studies, especially prospective ones, are required to elucidate any benefits of MR following successful R-CHOP treatment in patients with newly diagnosed COM/DIS NHL.
References
Your opinion matters
Which of the following would most increase your confidence in referring patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma for CAR T-cell therapy?