All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
In a recently published letter to the editor of Haematologica, Roopesh Kansara, from the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Canada, and colleagues reported the results of a retrospective study of the use of maintenance rituximab (MR) in newly diagnosed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) patients. The authors set out to understand the optimal treatment of Composite (COM) and Discordant (DIS) NHL patients, as typically they are excluded from published trials. Data used was from 43 patients treated for COM/DIS NHL with R-CHOP before the treatment policy changed in 2006, and 55 patients treated with R-CHOP followed by MR after 2006.
The authors concluded by stating that the addition of MR did not result in improved overall outcomes, or when comparing just COM or DIS patients. They also mentioned some issues with their study including a small sample size, differences in follow-up time, lack of standardized imaging, lack of cytogenetic marker status being captured, and differences in baseline characteristics between groups such as age. Further studies, especially prospective ones, are required to elucidate any benefits of MR following successful R-CHOP treatment in patients with newly diagnosed COM/DIS NHL.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox