All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Caribou Biosciences, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Nurix Therapeutics, Roche, Sobi and Thermo Fisher Scientific and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

EHA 2026 | What are the key findings from the DALY 2-EU trial of zamto-cel in R/R LBCL?

By Dylan Barrett

Share:

Featured:

Gloria IacoboniGloria Iacoboni

Jul 2, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to summarize the latest clinical evidence for zamto-cel in patients with R/R LBCL.


Do you know... Based on the crossover analysis from the DALY 2-EU trial, what is the likely impact of prior lines of therapy (2L vs 3L) on outcomes with zamto-cel in R/R LBCL?

During the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE, the Lymphoma Hub was pleased to speak with Gloria Iacoboni, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, ES. We asked, What are the key findings from the DALY 2-EU trial of zamtocabtagene autoleucel (zamto-cel) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL)? 

EHA 2026 | What are the key findings from the DALY 2-EU trial of zamto-cel in R/R LBCL?

Key points 

  • Efficacy of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies has been demonstrated for transplant-eligible patients with R/R LBCL;1 however, the level of evidence for CAR T-cell therapies in patients who are transplant ineligible should be strengthened. 
  • The phase II DALY 2-EU trial (NCT04844866) compared zamto-cel, an autologous non-cryopreserved, tandem CD20-CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy with a fixed 12-day manufacturing window and an average vein-to-vein time of 14 days, vs standard of care (rituximab + gemcitabine + oxaliplatin [R-GemOx] or polatuzumab vedotin + bendamustine + rituximab [Pola-BR]) in patients with R/R LBCL who are ineligible for transplant.1 
  • Primary results from the DALY 2-EU trial were presented at the 67th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, December 6–9, 2025, Orlando, US: 
    • After a median follow-up of 17 months, zamto-cel improved event-free survival (EFS) vs R-GemOx (median EFS, 6.21 months vs 2.53 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–0.58; p <0.0001).1 
    • The safety profile of zamto-cel was manageable, with low rates of Grade ≥3 or higher immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS; 1.3%), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 5.3%).1 
  • A protocol amendment in February 2023 allowed one-side crossover from the standard of care arm to zamto-cel as a third-line (3L) therapy for patients who relapsed/progressed ≤1 year after randomization or did not have a partial response in ≥8 weeks or complete response (CR) at end of treatment.2 
  • Results from an analysis of patients who crossed over to zamto-cel (n = 29) were presented during the EHA 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE: 
    • Neutropenia (55.2%) was the most common hematologic treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE).2 
    • TEAEs leading to death were reported in four patients (lymphoma progression, n = 2; bronchitis, n = 1; septic shock, n = 1).2 
    • Any-grade CRS and ICANS were reported in 48.3% (Grade 1, 27.6%; Grade 2, 13.8%; Grade 4, 6.9%) and 17.2% (Grade 1, 6.9%; Grade 2, 6.9%; Grade 4, 3.4%) of patients, respectively.2 
    • The best overall response rate was 79.3%, with a CR rate of 65.5%.2 
  • In the 3L setting, most intended patients received zamto-cel, and in this mainly refractory population, zamto-cel resulted in clinically meaningful response rates with low rates of severe CRS and ICANS, consistent with second-line treatment.2 

This educational resource is independently supported by Miltenyi Biomedicine. All content is developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders are allowed no influence. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In patients with R/R LBCL who progress after CAR‑T, which of the following data would most strengthen your confidence in considering BV+R2?