The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
Ibrutinib is an oral first-in-class Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor and is approved for the treatment of Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM), either as a single-agent therapy or in combination with rituximab.1,2 The Lymphoma Hub previously reported the outcomes of the phase III iNNOVATE trial (NCT02165397) after a median follow-up of 26.5 months, where the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab (ibrutinib-RTX) demonstrated a significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with rituximab alone in patients with WM.
During the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, Christian Buske from the Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, Germany, presented the results of the final analysis of the randomized arms of iNNOVATE, with an overall follow-up of 63 months.3 This article is based on data presented at the ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition and may supersede the data in the published abstract.
Patients with WM were randomized 1:1 to receive either ibrutinib-RTX (n = 75) or placebo plus rituximab (placebo-RTX; n = 75)
The primary endpoint was PFS assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints included response rates, overall survival (OS), hematologic improvement, time-to-next-treatment, and safety.
The median follow-up was 50 months (0.5–63). Patient disposition and treatment exposure can be seen in Table 1. In the placebo-RTX arm, 47% of patients crossed over to single-agent ibrutinib after experiencing PD. At study closure, 45% of patients remained on ibrutinib.
Table 1. Patient disposition and treatment exposure3
CI, confidence interval; N/A, not applicable; NE, not evaluable; NR, not reached; PD, progressive disease; RTX, rituximab; TTNT, time-to-next-treatment. |
||
|
Ibrutinib-RTX (n = 75) |
Placebo-RTX (n = 75) |
---|---|---|
Median duration of ibrutinib, months (range) |
48 (1–59) |
N/A |
Discontinued treatment, n (%) PD AE Patient withdrawal Investigator decision |
7 (9) 8 (11) 10 (13) 3 (4) |
34 (45) 5 (7) 7 (9) 29 (39) |
Patients receiving subsequent treatment, n (%) Median TTNT, months (95% CI) |
9 (12) NR (NE–NE) |
47 (63) 18 (11–33) |
Baseline and clinical characteristics were well balanced between arms, see Table 2.
Table 2. Baseline and clinical characteristics3
BM, bone marrow; Hgb, hemaglobin; IPSSWM, International Prognostic Scoring System for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia; RTX, rituximab; WHIM, Warts, Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections and Myelokathexis; WT, wild type. |
||
Characteristic at randomization |
Ibrutinib-RTX (n = 75) |
Placebo-RTX (n = 75) |
---|---|---|
Median age, years (range) |
70 (36–89) |
68 (39–85) |
Male, n (%) |
45 (60) |
54 (72) |
IPSSWM, n (%) Low Intermediate High |
15 (20) 33 (44) 27 (36) |
17 (23) 28 (37) 30 (40) |
Median Hgb, g/L (range) Baseline Hgb ≤ 110 g/L, n (%) |
105 (69–155) 44 (59) |
100 (66–161) 50 (67) |
Median serum IgM, g/L (range) |
33 (6–78) |
32 (6–83) |
Prior systemic therapies, n (%) 0 1–2 3 |
34 (45) 34 (45) 7 (9) |
34 (45) 36 (48) 5 (7) |
Genotype, n (%) MYD88(L265P)/CXCR4(WT) MYD88(L265P)/CXCR4(WHIM) MYD88(WT)/CXCR4(WT) Unknown |
32 (43) 26 (35) 11 (15) 6 (8) |
35 (47) 23 (31) 9 (12) 8 (11) |
BM infiltration: % cellularity, mean (range) |
73 (25–100) |
75 (2–100) |
Table 3. Response rates3
ORR, overall response rate; RTX, rituximab. Major response rate: ≥ partial response. |
||
Response rate |
Ibrutinib-RTX (n = 75) |
Placebo-RTX (n = 75) |
---|---|---|
ORR (months), % 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 |
84 88 89 92 92 92 92 |
32 40 41 43 44 44 44 |
Median time to ORR, months (range) |
1 (1–21) |
3 (1–22) |
Major response rate (months), % 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 |
52 65 68 72 72 76 76 |
12 21 27 29 29 31 31 |
Median time to major response, months (range) |
3 (1–46) |
6 (2–41) |
Table 4. Safety summary3
AE, adverse event; TEAEs, treatment-emergent adverse events. *One patient in the ibrutinib-RTX arm died due to pneumonia which was not considered to be related to the study drug. |
||
Prevalence |
Ibrutinib-RTX |
|
---|---|---|
Year 3–4 (n = 54) |
Year 4–5 (n = 40) |
|
AE leading to ibrutinib dose reduction, n (%) |
6 (11) |
2 (5) |
AE leading to ibrutinib discontinuation, n (%) |
2 (4) |
2 (5) |
Death due to TEAE, n (%) |
0 |
1 (3)* |
Major hemorrhage, n (%) |
0 |
0 |
Most common TEAEs, n (%) Diarrhea Arthralgia Hypertension |
6 (11) 8 (15) 9 (17) |
1 (3) 5 (13) 4 (10) |
With 63 months of overall follow-up in the iNNOVATE study, treatment with ibrutinib-RTX continued to demonstrate superiority over RTX in clinical outcomes in patients with WM. Responses deepened over time and median PFS was not reached with ibrutinib-RTX. The safety profile remained manageable with no new safety signals identified with long-term ibrutinib treatment.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content