All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.
CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-19)-reprogrammed autologous T-cells are innovative immunotherapies for heavily pretreated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, across CAR-19 products, ~60% of patients fail to achieve complete tumor eradication and prolonged remission. Inflammatory markers and clinical factors are associated with impaired responses, but tumor-intrinsic resistance drivers are largely undefined.
Here, we summarize the key genomic features underlying anti-CD19 CAR T-cell treatment failure in patients with lymphoma based on the recent article published by Jain, et al., in Blood in 2022.1
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis was performed on samples from patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL who had received treatment with CAR-19 T cells (R/R lymphoma cohort, n = 49). To increase the statistical power, WGS data from untreated DLBCL cases from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) were also added to the comparative analysis (PCAWG cohort, n = 50).
Table 1. Patient baseline characteristics*
Characteristics, % (unless otherwise stated) |
All patients (N = 49) |
---|---|
Median age (range), years |
65 (44–79) |
Sex |
|
Male |
77.6 |
Female |
22.4 |
Disease |
|
DLBCL |
81.6 |
TFL |
16.3 |
TCLL |
2.0 |
Stage at apheresis |
|
I/II |
16.3 |
III/IV |
83.7 |
IPI at apheresis |
|
1–2 |
30.6 |
3–5 |
69.4 |
ECOG Performance Status at apheresis |
|
0–1 |
77.6 |
2–3 |
22.4 |
Prior treatment regimens |
|
Median (range) |
2 (1–6) |
Salvage Chemotherapies |
|
Platinum compounds |
81.6 |
Cisplatin |
22.4 |
Carboplatin |
34.7 |
Oxaliplatin |
30.6 |
Melphalan |
22.4 |
Previous HDT/ASCR |
22.4 |
Bridging therapy |
|
Yes |
69.4 |
No |
30.6 |
CAR-19 Product |
|
Axicabtagene ciloleucel |
91.8 |
Tisagenlecleucel |
4.1 |
Lisocabtagene maraleucel |
4.1 |
Cytokine release syndrome |
|
Grade 0 |
18.4 |
Grade 1–2 |
73.5 |
Grade 3–5 |
8.2 |
Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome |
|
Grade 0 |
32.7 |
Grade 1–2 |
36.7 |
Grade 3–4 |
30.6 |
CAR-19 Outcome |
|
Response without progression |
36.7 |
Response with progression (relapse) |
46.9 |
Refractory disease |
16.3 |
CAR-19, CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor; DLBCL, diffuse large B cell lymphoma; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HDT/ASCR, high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell rescue; IPI, International Prognostic Index; TCLL, transformed chronic lymphocytic leukemia; TFL, transformed follicular lymphoma. |
Overall, markers of genomic complexity (APOBEC and chromothripsis) and specific genomic alterations (RHOA) were associated with resistance to CAR-19 immunotherapy for aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Further details on the genomic complexity and specific genome alterations are summarized below.
Mutational signature gene association
Twelve single base substitution (SBS) mutational signatures were involved in the R/R lymphoma cohort.
WGS identified four main complex structural variants and complex events:
Only chromothripsis showed worse PFS (p = 0.026) after CAR-19 treatment, with 18/22 (81.8%) cases (R/R DLBCL) experiencing early progression; however, this was not associated with OS. All de novo DLBCL with double minutes rapidly progressed and died after CAR-19 (p = 0.017 for PFS; p = 0.0011 for OS).
Despite unprecedented overall response rates to CAR-19 in heavily pretreated patients with DLBCL, a significant number of patients often fail to achieve survival outcomes. Genomic complexity and alterations appear to promote an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, limiting CAR-19 efficacy. The results discussed here are the foundation of further functional studies that can establish mechanistically how complex lymphoma genomes promote an environment hostile to CAR T cells and possibly other emerging immunotherapies.
Jain MD, Ziccheddu B, Coughlin CA, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals complex genomic features underlying anti-CD19 CAR T-cell treatment failures in lymphoma. Blood. Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021015008
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox