TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

HOVON NHL 24 trial: Rituximab plus MBVP in PCNSL

By Sabina Ray

Share:

Feb 12, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in primary central nervous system lymphoma.


Studies have reported conflicting results on the benefit of rituximab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Here, we summarize the long-term results after a median follow-up of 82.3 months of phase III HOVON NHL 24 trial published by Bromberg et al.1 in Neuro-oncology investigating patients treated with methotrexate, BCNU (bis-chloroethylnitrosourea, carmustine), teniposide, and prednisolone (MBVP) with and without rituximab.

Study design1

  • In total, 199 patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL were enrolled and randomized to MBVP with and without rituximab
  • The primary endpoint was event-free survival

Results1

  • Patients were aged 18–70 years
  • Event-free survival hazard ratio was not statistically different between treatment groups (0.85, p = 0.33)
  • Overall survival rate at 5 years was higher in patients treated with rituximab than without (53% vs 49%, respectively)
  • Mortality and disease progression were higher in patients treated with MBVP alone compared with in combination with rituximab (64% vs 55.5% and 63% vs 48%, respectively)

Safety1

  • PCNSL was the most common cause of death in patients treated with and without rituximab (69% and 70%, respectively), complication of treatment was the second most common cause of death (6% and 5%, respectively)

Key learnings

  • Rituximab did not improve survival outcomes and therefore, may not be beneficial to patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL
  • A significant proportion of patients have persistent clinically relevant fatigue after MBVP treatment confirming further treatment options are required to target this

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content