TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Ibrutinib voluntarily withdrawn in U.S. for lymphoma indications

By Kreena Mistry

Share:

Apr 14, 2023


On April 6, 2023, it was announced that ibrutinib, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been voluntarily withdrawn in the United States for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL).1 This follows a recommendation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Following two phase II trials, ibrutinib initially received accelerated approval due to its positive overall response rates. Continued approval was dependent upon its clinical benefit being demonstrated in the confirmatory phase III SHINE study (NCT01776840), which focused on patients with previously untreated MCL, and the phase III SELENE study (NCT01974440), which focused on patients with relapsed/refractory MZL and follicular lymphoma. As part of the FDA recommendation, it was outlined that primary endpoints from the two confirmatory studies were insufficient to support a full approval.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content