All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
The Lymphoma Hub has previously reported on the interim analysis of the ELARA trial (NCT03568461) for adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL). This analysis was presented during the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition by the Nathan Fowler, a Lymphoma Hub Executive Steering Committee member. Recently, at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, the primary analysis of the phase II ELARA trial was presented by Stephen Schuster. Here we provide a summary of the updated findings.
ELARA is a single-arm, multicenter, phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, in patients with R/R FL; further details can be found here.
The primary endpoint was complete response rate assessed by an Independent Review Committee based on the 2014 Lugano classification. The secondary endpoints included overall response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and cellular kinetics.
A total of 97 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 57 years (range, 29–73 years). The eligible patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of four prior therapies (range, 2–13). Approximately 76% of patients were refractory to ≥2 regimens (Table 1). The median infused dose of tisa-cel was 2.06 × 108 CAR+ viable T cells.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics*
Auto-HSCT, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ECOG PS, European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; FLIPI, follicular lymphoma international prognostic factor index; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase. |
|
Characteristic, % |
Total |
---|---|
ECOG PS |
|
0 |
58 |
1 |
38 |
2 |
4 |
Prior therapies |
|
≥5 |
28 |
Auto-HSCT |
36 |
Anti-CD20 mAb and alkylating agents |
65 |
PI3K inhibitors |
21 |
Lenalidomide and rituximab |
17 |
Stage III-IV disease |
85 |
FLIPI ≥3 |
60 |
Refractory to last line of therapy |
78 |
Refractory to ≥2 regimens |
76 |
Table 2. IRC-assessed response rate*
CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; IRC, Independent Review Committee; ORR, overall response rate; PR, partial response. |
|
Response rate, % |
Total |
---|---|
CR |
66† (95% CI, 56–75) |
PR |
20 |
ORR (CR+PR) |
86 (95% CI, 78–92) |
Table 3. AEs of special interest observed for all patients*
AE, adverse event; CRS, cytokine release syndrome. |
||
AE of special interest (within 8 weeks of infusion), % |
All grades |
Grade ≥3 |
---|---|---|
CRS |
49 |
0 |
Neurological adverse reactions |
9 |
1 |
Infections |
19 |
5 |
Hematologic disorders including cytopenia |
|
|
Neutropenia† |
31 |
28 |
Anemia |
25 |
13 |
Thrombocytopenia |
17 |
9 |
Tumor lysis syndrome |
1 |
1 |
Prolonged depletion‡ of B cells and/or agammaglobulinemia (IgG <4 g/L) |
10 |
0 |
The study demonstrated that tisa-cel had high rates of durable responses and these responses were effective and comparable across high-risk subgroups. No cases of high-grade CRS, no treatment related mortality, and low levels of neurotoxicity were consistent with the established favorable safety profile of tisa-cel. The positive findings from the study warrant further investigation of tisa-cel as a treatment for adult patients with R/R FL following ≥2 lines of therapy.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
What is your preferred therapy class when planning treatment for a patient with R/R DLBCL after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy ?