The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.
Question 1 of 1
Which of the following cardiovascular events was associated with baseline hypertension in ibrutinib-treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia at long-term follow-up?
A
B
C
D
The introduction of targeted therapies, such as Bruton’s kinase inhibitors, has significantly improved outcomes for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib was the first Bruton’s kinase inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014 for patients with previously treated CLL; approval was based on results from the phase III RESONATE trial (NCT01578707) in which ibrutinib demonstrated a higher efficacy compared with ofatumumab. In the phase III E1912 trial (NCT02048813), ibrutinib plus rituximab demonstrated a higher progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in untreated CLL when compared with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.1
Despite the clinical efficacy of ibrutinib in CLL, patients discontinue treatment due to common adverse events, such as new-onset hypertension and other cardiovascular toxicities. Here, we summarize an article published by Gordon et al.1 in Cancer on the long-term toxicities associated with ibrutinib in patients with CLL, with a focus on hypertension and cardiovascular effects.
The retrospective study included patients aged ≥18 years who were enrolled and treated across six different ibrutinib-based clinical trials from 2010 to 2017 at MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, US.
A total of 300 patients were included, comprising patients who were predominantly male and Caucasian, had comorbidities, relapsed/refractory disease, and high-risk features. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics*
Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated) |
(N = 300) |
Median age at enrollment (range), years |
65 (29–83) |
Sex |
|
Male |
70 |
Female |
30 |
Race |
|
Caucasian |
88 |
Black |
8 |
Obese (BMI ≥30 mg/m2) |
34 |
Tobacco use |
2.7 |
Comorbidities |
|
Coronary heart disease |
7.3 |
Hyperlipidemia |
43 |
Chronic kidney disease |
9.4 |
Congestive heart failure |
1.3 |
Obstructive sleep apnea |
10 |
Atrial fibrillation |
6.3 |
Hypertension |
69 |
Baseline SBP, mm Hg |
|
<100 |
2 |
100–119 |
22 |
120–129 |
22 |
130–139 |
24 |
140–179 |
30 |
≥180 |
0.7 |
Baseline DBP, mm Hg |
|
<70 |
30 |
70–79 |
35 |
80–89 |
29 |
90–119 |
5.7 |
Therapy |
|
Ibrutinib monotherapy |
52 |
Ibrutinib + rituximab |
44 |
Ibrutinib + BR |
4.7 |
R/R disease |
88 |
Rai stage |
|
0–1 |
56 |
2 |
10 |
3–4 |
18 |
FISH analysis |
|
Normal |
15 |
Deletion 11q |
18 |
Trisomy 12 |
9 |
Deletion 13q |
17 |
Deletion 17p |
17 |
TP53 mutation |
5 |
Mutated IGHV |
17 |
Unmutated IGHV |
53 |
Elevated B2 microglobulin |
46 |
Normal B2 microglobulin |
52 |
BMI, body mass index; BR, bendamustine rituximab; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; IGHV, immunoglobulin heavy chain variable; R/R, relapsed/refractory; SBP, systolic blood pressure. |
At the 5-year follow-up, there was an increase in median SBP and DBP across the total cohort in both men and women, regardless of baseline hypertension, obesity, or cardiovascular morbidity. Of the 71 patients who had hypertension while on ibrutinib treatment, 38% retained hypertension after ibrutinib discontinuation and 11.2% developed new-onset and persistent hypertension after ibrutinib discontinuation.
The incidence of new hypertension for patients who did not have hypertension at baseline, worsening hypertension in patients with baseline hypertension, and severe or very severe hypertension 5 years after the start of ibrutinib treatment are summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Incidence of new-onset, worsening, severe, and very severe hypertension at 5-year follow-up*
*Data from Gordon, et al.1
In the univariate analyses:
Figure 2. The association of baseline hypertension with cardiovascular events*
MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events.
*Data from Gordon, et al.1
At the 5-year follow-up, median OS was not reached in the total cohort with an estimated 5-year OS of 69.9%. The median EFS was 45.1 months, with an estimated 5-year OS of 39%. Two deaths occurred due to sudden cardiac death or arrest in male patients who had baseline hypertension and coronary heart disease.
Despite the retrospective nature, this study showed that hypertension is a common long-term effect of ibrutinib; however, it was shown to be manageable and reversible in patients with CLL. Hypertension was not associated with major adverse cardiovascular events or survival outcomes, and baseline characteristics associated with ibrutinib-related hypertension included:
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content