TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

NICE approves funding for IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib) as second-line therapy for adult CLL patients with del(17p), TP53 mutation, or in whom chemotherapy is unsuitable

By Terri Penfold

Share:

Feb 3, 2017


Last month, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has approved funding for IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib) for use by the NHS in England as a second-line therapy for adult CLL patients with del(17p), TP53 mutation, or in whom chemotherapy is unsuitable.1

Originally in March 2016, NICE rejected funding due to “numerous uncertainties in the evidence base and economic modelling”.

The change in decision is based on results of the RESONATE trials:

RESONATE (NCT01578707): ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in R/R CLL2

  • Ibrutinib had a significantly longer PFS than ofatumumab (median, not reached vs 1 months)
    • HR for progression or death in the ibrutinib group, 0.22; P < 0.001
  • Ibrutinib had significantly better OS than ofatumumab (HR for death, 0.43; P = 0.005)
  • At 12 months, OS rate was 90% and 81% in ibrutinib and ofatumumab groups, respectively
  • ORR was significantly higher with ibrutinib (42.6%) than with ofatumumab (4.1%; P < 0.001)

 RESONATE-2 (NCT01722487): ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL3

  • Ibrutinib had a significantly longer PFS than chlorambucil (median, not reached vs9 months) and a 84% lower risk of progression or death (HR, 0.16; P < 0.001)
  • Ibrutinib had a significantly better OS than chlorambucil, estimated survival rate at 24 months was 98% vs 85%; relative risk of death that was 84% lower with ibrutinib than with chlorambucil (HR, 0.16; P = 0.001)
  • ORR was higher with ibrutinib (86%) than with chlorambucil (35%; P < 0.001)

 RESONATE-17 (NCT01744691): ibrutinib in R/R CLL4

  • Median follow-up = 11·5 months (IQR 11.1–13.8)
  • Overall response by independent review committee = 92/144 patients (64%; 95% CI, 56–71)
  • Overall response by investigator assessment: 119/144 patients (83%; 95% CI, 76–88)
    • In extended analysis (median follow-up = 27.6 months [IQR 14.6–27.7]); overall response by investigator assessment: 120/144 (83%; 95% CI, 76–89)
  • 2-yr PFS = 63% (95% CI, 54–70); 2-yr OS = 75% (95% CI, 67–81)
  • Treatment discontinuation was due to progressive disease (n = 34, 24%), adverse events, unacceptable toxicity, or death (n = 24, 17%)

Now, 43 countries consisting of the US and 27 European nations (including the UK) routinely use IMBRUVICA® as a CLL treatment.1 Per patient, one year’s worth of IMBRUVICA® treatment costs over £55,000 (excluding the Janssen patient access scheme discount). Before now, IMBRUVICA® was only made available to UK patients through the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF).5

References