All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, Sobi, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase II VT-EBV-201 trial: VT-EBV-N for EBV-positive ENKTL

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Jul 13, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in T-cell lymphoma.


Results from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase II VT-EBV-201 trial (NCT03671850), evaluating VT-EBV-N, an autologous Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) therapy, as post-remission therapy in patients with EBV-positive extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL; N = 48), were presented by Deok-Hwan Yang at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive VT-EBV-N (n = 21) or autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs; n = 25). The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS).

Key data: The 2-year DFS rate was 95.0% with VT-EBV-N (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.5–99.3) vs 77.6% with PBMC control (95% CI, 54.2–90.0), and the 4-year DFS rate was 95.0% with VT-EBV-N (95% CI, 69.5–99.3) vs 56.3% with PMBCs (95% CI, 31.0–75.4) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02–1.02; p = 0.021). The overall survival (OS) rates were 100% with VT-EBV-N at 2- and 4-years vs 88.0% (95% CI, 67.3–96.0) and 83.8% (95% CI, 62.4–93.6) with PBMCs, respectively (p = 0.0205). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 10% vs 16% of patients receiving VT-EBV-N vs PBMCs; serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 19% vs 28%. No Grade ≥3 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) or serious ADRs occurred with VT-EBV-N.

Key learning: VT-EBV-N demonstrated durable post-remission disease control with a manageable safety profile in patients with EBV-positive ENKTL, supporting further evaluation as a potential consolidation strategy.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In patients with R/R LBCL who progress after CAR‑T, which of the following data would most strengthen your confidence in considering BV+R2?