All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, Sobi, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase III EPCORE DLBCL-1 trial: Epcoritamab vs CIT in R/R LBCL

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Jul 23, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in large B-cell lymphoma.


Results from the global, randomized, phase III EPCORE DLBCL-1 trial (NCT04628494), evaluating epcoritamab monotherapy vs investigator’s choice chemoimmunotherapy (CIT; rituximab + gemcitabine/oxaliplatin or bendamustine + rituximab) in 483 patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) ineligible for, or relapsed after, high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDT-auto-HSCT), were presented by Christopher Fox at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE. The primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) by Lugano criteria and overall survival (OS).

Key data: Epcoritamab significantly improved PFS vs CIT (median, 3.5 vs 3.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60–0.92; p = 0.0059) and demonstrated a markedly longer median duration of response (DoR; 36.8 vs 5.6 months). OS was not significantly different (median, 11.3 vs 10.3 months; HR, 0.96; p = 0.7285), confounded by COVID-19 mortality and greater subsequent therapy use in the CIT arm; post hoc adjusted analysis yielded HR 0.76 (95% CI, 0.59–0.99). Overall response rate (ORR) was 51% vs 48% (p = 0.526), with complete response rate (CRR) 38% vs 26% (p = 0.0032). Safety was consistent with epcoritamab’s established profile.

Key learning: Epcoritamab monotherapy demonstrated a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS, DoR, and CRR compared with investigator’s choice CIT in patients with R/R LBCL, supporting consideration of epcoritamab as a chemotherapy-free treatment option in this setting. Although the primary OS analysis was not statistically significant, its interpretation was limited by COVID-19 mortality and differential use of subsequent therapies.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In patients with R/R LBCL who progress after CAR‑T, which of the following data would most strengthen your confidence in considering BV+R2?