TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

POLARIX subgroup analysis: Pola-R-CHP for older patients aged ≥60 years with untreated DLBCL

By Abhilasha Verma

Share:

Apr 10, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.



Polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) is an anti-CD79b ADC that was approved in 2023 by the FDA in combination with rituximab (R)-CHP for the treatment of patients with untreated DLBCL based on results from the phase III POLARIX trial (NCT03274492).1 The Lymphoma Hub has previously covered the primary results and other analyses from the POLARIX trial. Results from a further subgroup analysis of this trial, focusing on older patients with previously untreated DLBCL aged ≥60 years (Pola-R-CHP, n = 311; R-CHOP, n = 318) were published in Blood Advances by Hu et al.1 The endpoints included PFS, OS, EFS, CRR, DFS, and safety.1


Key learnings
Pola-R-CHP improved PFS in patients aged ≥60 years and across all age subgroups analyzed. The greatest benefit was in patients aged ≥70 years (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41–0.96), for whom the risk of disease progression, relapse, or death was reduced by 37% compared with R-CHOP.
In patients with an IPI score of 3–5, a PFS benefit was observed with Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP (2-year PFS difference, 13% in patients aged ≥70 years). In patients aged ≥60 years, OS was similar for Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.67–1.47).
Safety profiles were similar for Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP, including Grade 3–4 AEs (62.7% vs 61.5%), Grade 3–5 infections (15.0% vs 12.9%), and Grade 5 AEs (3.6% vs 3.2%). A higher rate of Grade 3–4 febrile neutropenia (16.3% vs 7.6%) was observed with Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP, highlighting the importance of G-CSF prophylaxis in this population.​
Consistent with the POLARIX overall treatment population, Pola-R-CHP showed a favorable benefit-risk profile for patients aged ≥60 years with previously untreated DLBCL, suggesting that elderly patients can benefit from treatment with Pola-R-CHP with manageable toxicities.

Abbreviations: ADC, antibody−drug conjugate; AE, adverse event; CHOP, cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone; CHP, cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-prednisone; CI, confidence interval; CRR, complete response rate; DFS, disease-free survival; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; EFS, event-free survival; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; G-CSF, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; HR, hazard ratio; IPI, International Prognostic Index; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; Pola, polatuzumab vedotin; R, rituximab.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content