All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche and sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte and Lilly. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Visual abstract | MonumenTAL-1: Long-term follow-up of talquetamab for the treatment of RRMM

By Jennifer Reilly

Share:

Aug 8, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to recall the long-term follow-up data from MonumenTAL-1 of talquetamab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Do you know... In the long-term follow-up from MonumenTAL-1 (30–38 months), what was the approximate range of overall response rates observed with talquetamab?

The Multiple Myeloma Hub presents a visual abstract of the phase I/II MonumenTAL-1 study (NCT04634552), which evaluated the efficacy and safety of talquetamab, a G-protein coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)-directed bispecific T-cell engager, for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). MonumenTAL-1 assessed talquetamab across various dosing schedules and analyzed how prior T-cell redirection (TCR) therapy influenced clinical outcomes and toxicity.

Key takeaways

  • Talquetamab is the first approved bispecific T-cell engager, targeting GPRC5D in patients with RRMM.

  • With longer-term follow-up, talquetamab continued to demonstrate deep, durable responses and a consistent safety profile across dosing schedules and patient subgroups, including those with prior TCR.

  • The highest rates of response were observed in patients naïve to prior TCR at 74.1% with weekly dosing (QW) and 69.5% with dosing every 2 weeks (Q2W), compared with 66.7% in patients with prior TCR.

  • Durability of response was longer in patients receiving the Q2W regimen, with a median duration of response of 17.5 months in the Q2W cohort vs 9.5 months in the QW cohort and 19.2 months in patients with prior TCR QW and Q2W.

  • Progression-free survival and overall survival were also increased in the cohort of patients naïve to TCR, dosed Q2W.

  • The safety profile was consistent with prior reports, with no new safety signals identified in longer-term follow-up.

  • There were no new treatment discontinuations as a result of GPRC5D-related adverse events.

  • Flexibility in dosing schedules allows for individualized treatment decisions, balancing efficacy, tolerability, and patient preference.

  • These data support the continued use of talquetamab as an effective non-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) option, expanding options for patients who are heavily pretreated.

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which of the following reflects your thoughts about the feasibility of nursing staff preparing oncology treatments at the bedside at your clinical practice site, as opposed to in the pharmacy?