The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
Patients with primary refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) are known to have an unfavorable prognosis, with a very different clinical course compared with patients with FL, including exhibiting a higher risk of histological transformation (HT) to an aggressive lymphoma. The definition and time of onset of HT are highly variable, and there is no evidence regarding the most effective treatment for this population. Although the transformation of FL to an aggressive disease is rare, HT modifies the indolent evolution of FL, leading to considerably shortened overall survival. Therefore, study of the biological characteristics and clinical events in this population is required in order to predict patients that are most likely to undergo HT. The Lymphoma Hub has previously reported the Aristotle study, demonstrating that the risk of HT as a first event had been significantly reduced with the use of rituximab.
Here we present the findings from a secondary analysis of the Aristotle study1 exploring the risk of HT in patients with primary refractory FL, recently published by Alonso-Álvarez et al.2 in the European Journal of Cancer.
This was a retrospective analysis of the cohort of patients with newly diagnosed FL from the Aristotle study. Eligible patients from the Aristotle cohort were newly diagnosed with FL (Grade 1, 2, or 3a) between 1997 and 2013 across 11 European centers, had biopsy proven HT, received active treatment, and had an evaluable response at the end of induction therapy. Patients were grouped into four categories based on response to frontline therapy:
The primary endpoints included the cumulative incidence of HT and survival after relapse (SAR), measured from diagnosis of refractory disease or relapse till either death from any cause or last clinical contact. Time to HT was considered from the date of FL diagnosis to the date of HT. Response assessment was performed using computed tomography at each local site.
A total of 6,339 of the 6,970 patients from the Aristotle study cohort were included (Figure 1). The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Figure 1. Patients included in the analysis*
CR, complete response; FL, follicular lymphoma; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
*Adapted from Alonso-Álvarez, et al.2
Table 1. Baseline characteristics by treatment response*
CR, complete response; FLIPI, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index; PR, partial response; PREF, primary refractory; SD, stable disease. |
|||
Characteristics, % unless otherwise stated |
CR |
PR/SD |
PREF |
---|---|---|---|
Age >60 years |
39 |
45 |
47 |
Sex, female |
53 |
49 |
48 |
Histology |
|
|
|
Grade 1–2 |
66 |
66 |
58 |
Grade 3 |
16 |
12 |
11 |
FLIPI |
|
|
|
0–1 |
34 |
22 |
15 |
2 |
33 |
33 |
22 |
3–5 |
32 |
46 |
63 |
Rituximab-containing regimens at frontline |
79 |
74 |
56 |
Regarding the 5-year cumulative incidence of HT:
Regarding the 5-year SAR:
Table 2. 5-year cumulative incidence of HT and SAR*
CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; HT, histological transformation; PR, partial response; PREF, primary refractory; SAR, survival after relapse; SD, stable disease. |
||||
Outcomes |
CR, % (95% CI) |
PR/SD, % (95% CI) |
PREF, % (95% CI) |
p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
5-year cumulative incidence |
4 (3–4) |
7 (6–9) |
34 (27–43) |
<0.001 |
5-year SAR |
63 (66–72) |
57 (54–61)/51 (43–58) |
33 (28–39) |
<0.001 |
PREF who developed HT† |
— |
— |
21 (12–31) |
<0.001 |
PREF who did not develop HT‡ |
— |
— |
38 (31–44) |
<0.001 |
This retrospective subgroup analysis of patients from the Aristotle study demonstrated that patients with primary refractory FL have an unfavorable prognosis, including very poor survival with a high risk of HT. Although the study was limited by the small sample size of patients with primary refractory disease and its retrospective nature (as well as incomplete data), this was the largest study in this population reported to date. Further research is needed to understand the clinical and biological parameters in patients with primary refractory FL to detect and/or predict histological transformation.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content