TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide granted priority review by US FDA

By Emily Smith

Share:

Apr 8, 2020


The Biologics License Application (BLA) submitted for tafasitamab (MOR208), an anti-CD19 antibody, in combination with lenalidomide, will be given Priority Review by the United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The BLA is specifically for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).1 The FDA previously granted tafasitamab and lenalidomide breakthrough therapy designation for R/R DLBCL in 2017. The submission was based on the results from the L-MIND trial and the RE-MIND trial1,2

  • L-MIND (NCT02399085): single arm, open-label, multicenter phase II study, evaluating tafasitamab and lenalidomide for patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation who had received ≤ 3 prior lines of therapy, including at least one anti‐CD20 therapy2
    • Dosing schedules2
      • Tafasitamab: 12 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion, weekly in Cycles 1–3 (with a loading dose on Day 4 of Cycle 1) and bi-weekly for Cycle 4–12, in 4-week cycles. Treatment continued until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation due to other reason
      • Lenalidomide: 25 mg daily on Days 1–21, in 4-week cycles. Treatment continued for up to 12 weeks in the absence of PD or unacceptable toxicity
    • 81 patients were recruited; 23% had early relapse (≤ 12 months from diagnosis) and 40% were refractory to rituximab2
    • Primary endpoint: independent review committee (IRC)‐assessed overall response rate (ORR; n = 76): 54%2
      • Complete response rate by IRC assessment: 32%
      • These figures were comparable with investigator (INV)-assessed ORR and CR rates (n = 81) of 58% and 33%, respectively
    • At a median follow‐up of 12 months, INV-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population were
      • PFS: 16.2 months (95% CI, 6.3–not reached [NR])2
      • OS: NR (95% CI, 18.6–NR)2
      • Thirty-seven patients remained on study treatment
    • Serious adverse events were experienced by 17% of patients, predominantly infection (10%) and neutropenic fever (5%)2

Results of the L-MIND trial in R/R DLBCL

  • RE-MIND (NCT04150328): observational retrospective cohort study in 490 patients with R/R DLBCL who were not eligible for transplant and who were treated with lenalidomide monotherapy in the real-world setting in the US and Europe. This study was designed to characterize the effectiveness of lenalidomide monotherapy and to compare to the results with the efficacy outcomes of the tafasitamab-lenalidomide combination in L-MIND1,3
    • 76 patients from RE-MIND were matched 1:1 to patients from L-MIND based on baseline characteristics3
    • Given as tafasitamab + lenalidomide vs lenalidomide monotherapy3
      • ORR: 67.1% vs 34.2%; p < 0.0001
      • CR: 39.5% vs 11.8%; p < 0.0001
      • OS: NR vs 9.3 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.47, 95% CI, 0.30–0.73; p<0.0008

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content