All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Time-limited therapy for CLL and lymphoma – who, what, and how?

By Abhilasha Verma

Share:

Featured:

Kieron DunleavyKieron DunleavyGrzegorz NowakowskiGrzegorz NowakowskiMartin DreylingMartin DreylingMarek TrněnýMarek TrněnýGilles SallesGilles SallesFrancesc BoschFrancesc BoschAstrid PavlovskyAstrid PavlovskyMiles PrinceMiles PrinceAlison MoskowitzAlison MoskowitzAndrew DaviesAndrew Davies

May 29, 2023

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite new clinical developments in lymphoma.


During the Lymphoma Hub Steering Committee meeting, Francesc Bosch chaired a discussion on: Time-limited therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and lymphoma – who, what, and how? This discussion also featured Gilles Salles, Grzegorz Nowakowski, Andrew Davies, Kieron Dunleavy, Marek Trněný, Miles Prince, Alison Moskowitz, and Astrid Pavlovsky. The panel discussed the advantages, disadvantages, and important considerations for time-limited versus continuous therapy in both CLL and lymphoma.

Time-limited for CLL and lymphoma – who, what, and how?

Time-limited versus continuous therapy in DLBCL

The first topic discussed was time-limited versus continuous therapy of bispecifics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), such as gloflitamab versus epcoritamab. Moskowitz and Salles highlighted that complete response (CR) rates and the stage of disease are important factors when choosing continuous versus time-limited therapy, as those achieving CR in earlier stages could warrant the stopping of treatment, whereas those achieving CR after multiply-relapsed disease could be more inclined to continue therapy. Nowakowski mentions that the optimal approach is dependent on the clinical scenario, as continuous therapy may be beneficial in the relapsed/refractory setting given the limited treatment options. Davies points out that there is emerging data on the resistance to bispecifics in DLBCL, and Trněný mentions the importance of patient preference in decision-making.  

Key questions in the use of continuous therapy in DLBCL include:

  • What would happen if therapy is stopped and re-exposed following progression?
  • What are the long-term bispecific-related toxicities in DLBCL?

Time-limited versus continuous therapy in CLL

The second topic of discussion was time-limited versus continuous therapy in CLL, such as venetoclax versus Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Pavlovsky and Prince highlighted that patient preference and age is key in this decision. Dunleavy mentioned that there is ongoing data on the role of genetics for therapy selection in CLL.

A key question in CLL is:

  • What are the outcomes to further lines of therapy following time-limited therapy in younger patients?

Overall, the key considerations in whether to choose continuous versus time-limited therapy include patient preference, stage of disease, genetics, toxicities, and age.

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.

Your opinion matters

When selecting the next therapy for patients with R/R MCL after BTKi progression, what is your most important consideration?