All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

The Lymphoma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2021-01-29T12:33:12.000Z

Umbralisib and ublituximab combination is superior to current standard of care for patients with untreated, relapsed, or refractory CLL

Jan 29, 2021
Share:

Bookmark this article

The synergistic activity of umbralisib, a dual inhibitor of phosphoinositol 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) and casein kinase-1 epsilon (CK1ε), and ublituximab, which targets CD20, has been demonstrated in preclinical studies and early-phase clinical trials for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

In May 2020, the Lymphoma Hub reported early findings from the Unity-CLL trial (NCT02612311), which showed a  progression-free survival (PFS) benefit of umbralisib plus ublituximab (U2) compared with obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (O + Chl) for patients with treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL at the interim analysis; read the article from the Lymphoma Hub, here. U2 was subsequently given fast track designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of CLL.

At the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition, John Gribben presented further findings from the Unity-CLL study, including safety data, and extended follow-up results.

Study design

  • Multicenter, international, randomized phase III trial
  • February 2016–October 2017
  • 421 patients

Patient criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • TN or R/R CLL
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤ 2
  • Adequate organ function

Stratification according to treatment status (TN vs R/R) and chromosomal abnormality, del(17p) status

Randomization

  • Initial randomization was 1:1:1:1 U2 vs O + Chl vs umbralisib monotherapy vs ublituximab monotherapy (requirements of the umbralisib and ublituximab monotherapy arms were met in May 2017, allowing closure of these arms)
  • Data presented here is for the secondary randomization: 1:1 U2 vs O + Chl 

Study endpoints

Assessed by an independent review committee (IRC), the study endpoints were defined as

  • primary
    • PFS for U2 vs O + Chl
  • secondary
    • overall response rate (ORR)
    • complete response
    • undetectable minimal residual disease
    • duration of response
    • safety: assessed from the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study medication in each arm

Results

Patient characteristics and efficacy

  • Key patient characteristics (n = 421) are shown in Table 1
  • Median follow-up was 36.7 months
  • A statistically significant improvement in PFS was identified in patients receiving U2 compared with those receiving O + Chl (p < 0.0001; Table 2). 2-year PFS was 60.8% for the U2 arm compared with 40.4% for the O + Chl arm.
  • This PFS benefit was maintained in all subgroups, including TN and previously treated patients (Table 2)
  • The IRC-assessed ORR rate was 83.3% for the U2 arm vs 68.7% for the O + Chl arm (p < 0.001; Table 2)
  • Higher response rates for U2 compared with O + Chl were maintained across TN (84% vs 78%), previously treated (82% vs 57%) and prior Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-treated (57% vs 25%) subgroups.
  • Minimal residual disease data are yet to be published

Table 1. Key patient characteristics1

BTKi, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor; Chl, chlorambucil; Del, deletion; IGHV, immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region; O, obinutuzumab; TN, treatment-naïve; U2, umbralisib plus ublituximab.

Characteristic

U2 arm (n = 210)

O + Chl arm (n = 211)

Median age (range)

67(39–88)

68 (36–91)

Del 17p, n (%)

19 (9)

23 (11)

Del 11q, n (%)

47 (22)

38 (18)

Unmutated IGHV, n (%)

113 (54)

115 (55)

TN, n (%)

119 (57)

121 (57)

Previously treated, n (%)

91 (43)

90 (43)

Median number of prior therapies (range)

2 (1–9)

1 (1–8)

Prior BTKi therapy, n (%)

12 (15)

12 (13)

Table 2. PFS and ORR for patients receiving U2 vs O + Chl1

Chl, chlorambucil; IRC, independent review committee; ITT, intention-to-treat; NE, not estimable; O, obinutuzumab; ORR, overall response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; TN, treatment-naïve; U2, umbralisib plus ublituximab.

PFS and ORR

U2 arm

O + Chl arm

HR

(95% CI)

p value

Median PFS for ITT patients, months (95% CI)

31.9

(28.2–35.8)

17.9

(16.1–22.6)

0.546

(0.413–0.720)

< 0.0001

Median PFS for TN patients, months (95% CI)

38.5

(33.2–NE)

26.1

(19.4–33.1)

0.482

(0.316–0.736)

< 0.001

Median PFS for previously treated patients, months (95% CI)

19.5

(14.6–27.7)

12.9

(11.1–16.1)

0.601

(0.415–0.869)

< 0.01

IRC assessed ORR, % (95% CI)

83.3

68.7

< 0.001

Safety

U2 had a similar adverse event (AE) profile to O + Chl (Table 3). It is notable that patients receiving U2 had a considerably longer median treatment exposure compared with O + Chl.

Table 3. Safety overview1

AE, adverse event; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; PI3K, phosphoinositol 3-kinase.

Safety

U2

O + Chl

Median treatment duration, months

21

5

Grade ≥ 3 AE, %

82

66

   Neutropenia (Grade 3–4)

31

36

   Diarrhea (Grade 3–4)

12

3

   Thrombocytopenia (Grade 3–4)

4

14

Grade ≥ 3 events of clinical interest (PI3K-specific), %

   AST/ALT elevation

14

3

   Colitis

2

0.5

   Pneumonitis

0.5

0

   Rash

2

0.5

   Opportunistic infections

5.8

1.5

Conclusion

In this study, the combination of umbralisib and ublituximab resulted in a significantly improved PFS for patients with either TN or R/R CLL, relative to the current standard of care, O + Chl. U2 was well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile. Larger clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.

  1. Gribben JG, Jurczak W, Jacobs R, et al. Umbralisib plus ublituximab (U2) is superior to obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (O+Chl) in patients with treatment naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): Results from the phase 3 Unity-CLL study. Oral Abstract #543. 62nd ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; Dec 7, 2020; Virtual.

Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.

Please spare a moment to share yours.

Please select or type your specialty

  Thank you

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox