The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
On September 19, 2022, it was announced that the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) had issued a positive opinion for the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor zanubrutinib for the treatment of adult patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who have received at least one prior anti-CD20-based therapy.1 This announcement is based on key data obtained from the phase II MAGNOLIA trial (NCT03846427).1
The MAGNOLIA trial reported an overall response rate of 68% (95% CI, 55.6–79.1), a complete response rate of 26%, and a partial response rate of 42%.1 The median time to response was 2.8 months. Extranodal, nodal, splenic, and unknown MZL subtypes demonstrated overall response rates of 64%, 76%, 67%, and 50%, respectively. In addition, zanubrutinib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, consistent with previous studies.1
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content