All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche and sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte and Lilly. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
The randomized phase III ELEVATE-TN trial (NCT02475681) evaluated acalabrutinib ± obinutuzumab vs chlorambucil + obinutuzumab in 535 patients with treatment-naïve (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Sharman et al. published 6-year follow-up results from this trial, in Blood.
Key data: At median follow-up of 74.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached for acalabrutinib + obinutuzumab and acalabrutinib monotherapy vs 27.8 months for chlorambucil + obinutuzumab (both p < 0.0001), with estimated 72-month PFS rates of 78.0%, 61.5%, and 17.2%, respectively. The post hoc analysis showed that acalabrutinib + obinutuzumab improved PFS vs acalabrutinib monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.86; p = 0.0229). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for all treatments; acalabrutinib + obinutuzumab demonstrated significantly longer OS than chlorambucil + obinutuzumab (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39–0.97; p = 0.0349).
Key learning: With 6 years of follow-up, the PFS benefit of the acalabrutinib-containing arms was maintained in patients with TN CLL. The OS benefit of first-line acalabrutinib + obinutuzumab vs chlorambucil + obinutuzumab supports its long-term use for the treatment of this patient population.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
In your experience, when do most CRS/ICANS events occur after lisocabtagene maraleucel infusion?