All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

ASCO 2018 | Acalabrutinib monotherapy demonstrated good efficacy in WM

By Sara Valente

Share:

Jun 12, 2018


On Sunday 3rd June an oral abstract session took place at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting. Abstract 7501 was presented by Roger Owen, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, on acalabrutinib use in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM).

The phase II study was a multi-center, international and open-label trial testing the use of acalabrutinib in patients with WM. Patients were either treatment-naïve (TN), n = 14, or relapsed/refractory (R/R), n = 92. Treatment with acalabrutinib was either 100mg twice daily or 200mg every day in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) based on either the 6th IWWM criteria or the modified 3rd IWWM criteria.

Key Findings

  • ORR based on 6th IWWM criteria and modified 3rd IWWM criteria was 93% for both TN and R/R patients
  • The 24-month duration of response rate for TN vs R/R
    • 90% (95% CI, 47.3%, 98.5%) vs 82% (95% CI, 71.9%, 88.7%)
  • 24-month progression-free survival for TN vs R/R
    • 90% vs 81.9%
  • 24-month overall survival rate for TN vs R/R
    • 91.7% vs 88.9%
  • Most common Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) of all patients were neutropenia (16%), lower respiratory tract infection (5%) and pneumonia (7%)

Dr Owens concluded that acalabrutinib monotherapy showed high efficacy in WM in both TN and R/R patients. He noted that the “safety profile is very good, and most AEs were of low grade and very limited number of dropouts on account of AEs.”

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.

Your opinion matters

When selecting the next therapy for patients with R/R MCL after BTKi progression, what is your most important consideration?