The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
During the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, the Lymphoma Hub was pleased to speak to Constantine Tam, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, AU. In this video, he discusses the phase III ASPEN trial, where treatment with the two Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, zanubrutinib and ibrutinib, were compared in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia.
Constantine Tam, explains the mechanism of action of the two drugs, the patient response rates and safety results of the two treatment arms. He also explains that although the trial did not meet its primary endpoint (very good partial response), zanubrutinib showed greater tolerability and safety compared to ibrutinib.
ASPEN trial: zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia