All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Nurix Therapeutics, Roche, Sobi and Thermo Fisher Scientific and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
Do you know... Which feature of survival data is most commonly used to suggest curative potential in large B-cell lymphoma?
Before the advent of CAR T‑cell therapy, patients receiving second-line treatment for large B‑cell lymphoma (LBCL) who were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation had poor outcomes, with a median overall survival of approximately 4 months.1
As long-term survival data for CAR T-cell therapy have matured, the concept of potential curative outcomes in LBCL has gained prominence. In this setting, survival plateaus following completion of therapy are widely interpreted as evidence of durable remission, supported by 3‑year overall survival and 2-year event-free survival.2,3 Initial evidence for this paradigm was observed in the ZUMA‑1 trial of axicabtagene ciloleucel, which demonstrated durable remissions and a plateau in long-term follow-up among patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL.4
Long-term data for lisocabtagene maraleucel from the TRANSFORM and TRANSCEND NHL 001 studies further extend this evidence base. Across both trials, prolonged survival and plateauing of overall and progression-free survival curves are consistent with durable long-term disease control in a subset of patients. Importantly, extended follow-up has revealed no new safety signals, supporting sustained benefit without evidence of cumulative toxicity.5,6






This educational resource is independently supported by Bristol Myers Squibb. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
What is the primary reason you use bridging therapy in patients with DLBCL awaiting CAR T-cell therapy?