All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson, Roche and sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

EHA 2025 | How effective is epcoritamab + R-ICE in patients with R/R DLBCL who are eligible for ASCT?

By Abhilasha Verma

Share:

Featured:

Marek TrněnýMarek Trněný

Jun 16, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to recall the efficacy and safety outcomes from the EPCORE NHL-2 trial of epcoritamab plus rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide in patients with R/R DLBCL who are eligible for ASCT.


Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.

Question 1 of 1

In the phase I/II EPCORE NHL-2 trial, what was the overall response rate for patients with R/R DLBCL treated with the epcor + R-ICE regimen?

A

B

C

D

During the 30th European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress, the Lymphoma Hub was pleased to speak to Marek Trněný, Charles University, Prague, CZ. We asked, How effective is epcoritamab (epcor) + rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (R-ICE) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)?

How effective is epcoritamab + R-ICE in patients with R/R DLBCL who are eligible for ASCT?

How effective is epcoritamab + R-ICE in patients with R/R DLBCL who are eligible for ASCT?

In this interview, Trněný shares the first efficacy and safety outcomes from the phase I/II EPCORE NHL-2 trial (NCT04663347) of epcor + R-ICE in patients with R/R DLBCL, highlighting the promising efficacy and manageable safety of this regimen. 

During the interview, Trněný shared the following key points1:

  • EPCORE NHL-2 is a phase I/II trial assessing epcor (a subcutaneous CD3×CD20 bispecific antibody) + R-ICE in patients with R/R DLBCL eligible for ASCT.

  • The data cutoff date was December 18, 2024; median follow-up was 11 months. 

  • 31 patients were treated; 81% had one prior therapy, and 65% relapsed within 12 months. 

  • The overall response rate was 87%, and the complete response rate was 65%. 

  • 65% proceeded to ASCT.

  • Adverse events (AE) were manageable and consistent with the expected toxicity profile for patients treated with salvage therapy. 

  • In summary, epcor + R-ICE achieved high response rates and enabled a majority of high-risk patients to proceed to ASCT. The combination shows promise as an effective, viable salvage therapy for patients with R/R DLBCL who are eligible for ASCT.

This educational resource is independently supported by AbbVie. All content is developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee; funders are allowed no influence on the content of this resource.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which of the following do you consider a key challenge when implementing the BrECADD regimen for the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma?