All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer.   View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Epi-RCHOP phase II results: Tazemetostat in combination with R-CHOP in newly diagnosed DLBCL

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Jul 18, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.



Tazemetostat (Taz) is a selective oral EZH2 inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for FL. Taz has demonstrated a favorable safety profile as a single agent in DLBCL. Phase I of the Epi-RCHOP trial (NCT02889523) reported that Taz in combination with R-CHOP was well tolerated and had comparable pharmacokinetic results with those of R-CHOP alone. The results from phase II of the Epi-RCHOP trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Taz + R-CHOP in elderly patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL were recently published by Sarkozy et al. in eClinicalMedicine.1 

Eligible patients were aged between ≥60 and ≤80 years with a diagnosis of untreated DLBCL (N = 122). Patients received up to 6 cycles of R-CHOP every 28 days in combination with continuous Taz at 800 mg BID, followed by 2 cycles of Taz and rituximab. The primary endpoint was PET-assessed complete metabolic response (CMR) rate. Key secondary endpoints included PFS, DOR, and OS. The median follow-up was 18.5 months (range 0.2–28.1 months).

Key learnings

At EOT or PTD, 75.4% and 6.6% of patients in the efficacy set (N = 122) achieved CMR and PMR, respectively. In the sensitivity set (n = 112), 82.1% and 7.1% of patients achieved CMR and PMR, respectively.

The estimated PFS and OS were 77.7% and 88.8%, respectively, in the safety set (N = 122). The ORR was 82.0% and 89.3% in the safety and sensitivity sets, respectively.

The most frequent Grade ≥3 hematological AEs included neutropenia (48%), anemia (23%), and thrombocytopenia (17%). SAEs were reported in 25% of patients; infection (3%) and gastrointestinal hypomotility (3%) were the most frequent SAEs.

Taz + R-CHOP demonstrated efficacy with promising CMR rates in elderly patients with DLBCL. Future long-term and complementary biomarker studies are needed for a personalized treatment approach in this population.

AE, adverse event; BID, twice daily; CMR, complete metabolic response; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; DOR, duration of response; EOT, end of treatment; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; FL, follicular lymphoma; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PET, positron emission tomography; PFS, progression-free survival; PMR, partial metabolic response; PTD, premature treatment discontinuation; R-CHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; SAE, serious adverse event; Taz, tazemetostat.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which of the following would most increase your confidence in referring patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma for CAR T-cell therapy?