All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
Eligible patients were aged between ≥60 and ≤80 years with a diagnosis of untreated DLBCL (N = 122). Patients received up to 6 cycles of R-CHOP every 28 days in combination with continuous Taz at 800 mg BID, followed by 2 cycles of Taz and rituximab. The primary endpoint was PET-assessed complete metabolic response (CMR) rate. Key secondary endpoints included PFS, DOR, and OS. The median follow-up was 18.5 months (range 0.2–28.1 months). |
Key learnings |
At EOT or PTD, 75.4% and 6.6% of patients in the efficacy set (N = 122) achieved CMR and PMR, respectively. In the sensitivity set (n = 112), 82.1% and 7.1% of patients achieved CMR and PMR, respectively. |
The estimated PFS and OS were 77.7% and 88.8%, respectively, in the safety set (N = 122). The ORR was 82.0% and 89.3% in the safety and sensitivity sets, respectively. |
The most frequent Grade ≥3 hematological AEs included neutropenia (48%), anemia (23%), and thrombocytopenia (17%). SAEs were reported in 25% of patients; infection (3%) and gastrointestinal hypomotility (3%) were the most frequent SAEs. |
Taz + R-CHOP demonstrated efficacy with promising CMR rates in elderly patients with DLBCL. Future long-term and complementary biomarker studies are needed for a personalized treatment approach in this population. |
AE, adverse event; BID, twice daily; CMR, complete metabolic response; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; DOR, duration of response; EOT, end of treatment; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; FL, follicular lymphoma; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PET, positron emission tomography; PFS, progression-free survival; PMR, partial metabolic response; PTD, premature treatment discontinuation; R-CHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; SAE, serious adverse event; Taz, tazemetostat.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
Which of the following would most increase your confidence in referring patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma for CAR T-cell therapy?