TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

How to treat MCL that is refractory to BTK inhibitors

By Abhilasha Verma

Share:

Featured:

Grzegorz NowakowskiGrzegorz NowakowskiMartin DreylingMartin DreylingMichael DickinsonMichael DickinsonGilles SallesGilles SallesFrancesc BoschFrancesc Bosch

Dec 24, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in mantle cell lymphoma.


During the Lymphoma Hub Steering Committee meeting, Martin Dreyling, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, DE, chaired a discussion on, How to treat mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) that is refractory to Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. This discussion also featured Gilles SallesFrancesc BoschGrzegorz Nowakowski, and Michael Dickinson.

How to treat MCL that is refractory to BTK inhibitors

Dreyling begins with providing an overview of regional MCL treatment guidelines and highlighted the treatment challenges in early and late relapses. In German, Austrian, and Swiss guidelines, the addition of BTK inhibitors is standard for younger patients, challenging the previous standard of care of autologous transplant. Treatment challenges vary based on the timing of relapse. For instance, late relapses provide greater flexibility in treatment options, whereas early relapses pose difficulties due to limited approved therapies.

The panel then delved into the challenges of treating patients with MCL who relapse after BTK inhibitor therapy by emphasizing the importance of tailoring treatment strategies based on disease biology, relapse timing, and patient factors such as age and comorbidities. Treatment approaches often include continuing BTK inhibitor therapy even after disease progression to manage accelerated disease. For fit patients, CAR T-cell therapies are a viable option, while bispecific antibodies are emerging as promising alternatives. Regional differences further complicate treatment. In Australia, limited access to frontline BTK inhibitors has increased reliance on clinical trials and therapies such as CAR T-cells and bispecific antibodies. Conversely, in the United States, CAR T-cell therapies are beneficial for fit but not frail patients who have not previously received them.

The discussion underscored the complexity of managing MCL that is refractory to BTK inhibitors, as well as the need for personalized approaches informed by regional availability and patient-specific considerations.

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content