All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly USA, LLC, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
Results from the multicenter, international, open-label, phase I/II GO40554 (NCT03677154) trial, evaluating subcutaneous mosunetuzumab (Mosun) + polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) as first-line treatment in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) classified as unfit or frail by simplified geriatric assessment (sGA), were published in Blood by Olszewski et al. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at the end of treatment (EoT).
Key data: The median age was 81 years (range, 66–94). In the efficacy analysis set (n = 101), the ORR at EoT was 61.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.1–70.9), with a complete response (CR) rate of 56.4% (95% CI, 46.2–66.3). The best observed ORR and CR rates during treatment were 80.2% and 66.3%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 30.4 months and median overall survival (OS), duration of CR (DoCR), and duration of response (DoR) were not reached (NR). Estimated 2-year PFS, OS, DoCR, and DoR were 52.2%, 62.4%, 72.8%, and 61.1%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 61.1% of patients, with serious AEs (SAEs) in 47.2% of patients. The most common AE was neutropenia (any grade, 36.1%; Grade ≥3, 30.6%). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was reported in 30.6% of patients (Grade 1, 23.1%; Grade 2, 5.6%; Grade 3, 1.9%). Infections were reported in 51.9% of patients, with Grade 5 infections in 12% of patients; infection-related mortality occurred predominantly during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic and disproportionately affected participants classified as frail.
Key learning: In the GO40554 trial, Mosun + Pola demonstrated durable efficacy as first-line therapy in older, frail or unfit patients with DLBCL, supporting further prospective evaluation of immunotherapy-based, chemotherapy-sparing approaches in this population. While the safety profile was generally manageable, infections, including fatal infections, highlight the need for vigilance and appropriate prophylaxis.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.
Your opinion matters
In which lymphoma subtypes do you currently use next-generation sequencing as part of the diagnostic work-up in your practice?