All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Bookmark this article
The anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), was approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) following two or more prior lines of therapy.1 The approvals were based on the results from the ZUMA-1 study, and the long-term results can be found on the Lymphoma Hub here.
The programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) immune checkpoint axis is imperative for physiological immune regulation but is dysregulated in a number of cancers, resulting in decreased immune-mediated tumor destruction.2 Upregulation of PD-1 on CAR T-cells and PD-L1 on tumor cells has been observed following CAR T-cell infusion, which may jeopardize treatment effectiveness.3
The phase I/II of the ZUMA-6 (NCT02926833) study is currently investigating the safety and efficacy of axi-cel in combination with the humanized, anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, atezolizumab (atezo), for the treatment of adult patients with R/R diffuse LBCL (DLBCL). The study aims to evaluate the hypothesis that immune checkpoint blockade may augment CAR T-cell activity.3
At the 2020 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) virtual annual meeting, Caron Jacobson presented the results from the phase II portion of the ZUMA-6 study – below is a summary.3
Figure 1. Study design for phase I/II portions of the ZUMA-6 study3
Atezo, atezolizumab; axi-cel, axicabtagene ciloleucel; Cy, cyclophosphamide; DLT, dose limiting toxicity; flu, fludarabine
Results presented represent the phase I Cohort 3 and phase II portions of this study, unless stated otherwise.
Table1. Baseline patient characteristics and tumor PD-L1 expression3
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IPI, International Prognostic Index *H = intensity score multiplied by the % of cells that were positive for each level. Four patients had missing data; †+1, +2, and +3 refer to weak, moderate, and strong staining for PD-L1 using the VENTANA PD-L1 assay. Four patients had missing data |
|
Characteristic |
Phase I Cohort 3 + phase II (n = 28) |
Median age, years (range) |
58 (42 – 71) |
Male, % |
57 |
ECOG performance status, % 0 1 |
61 39 |
Disease stage, % II III or IV |
21 79 |
IPI score, % 0 – 2 3 – 4 |
54 46 |
Prior therapies, % ≥ 2 ≥ 3 |
86 50 |
Primary refractory disease, % |
14 |
PD-L1 expression Median baseline tumor cell PD-L1 H score (range)* PD-L1 immune infiltrate intensity score,† % +1 +2 +3 |
40 (0 – 240)
25 25 39 |
Figure 2. Patient response rates3
CR, complete response; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease
Table 2. Patient outcomes3
CI, confidence interval; DOR, duration of response; NE, not evaluable; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival *February 21, 2019 |
|
|
Phase I Cohort 3 + phase II (n = 28) |
Patients with ongoing response at cutoff*, % |
46 |
DOR Median, months 95% CI 6-month estimate, % |
NR 1.8 – NE 62 |
PFS Median, months 95% CI 6-month estimate, % |
NR 3.1 – NE 50 |
OS Median, months 95% CI 6-month estimate, % |
NR 12 – NE 71 |
The administration of atezo following axi-cel demonstrated, with a manageable safety profile, that it was consistent with that reported in the ZUMA-1 study. Although there has been no statistical comparison between patient outcomes in the ZUMA-6 vs ZUMA-1 studies, the combination of axi-cel with atezo demonstrated similar clinical efficacy to axi-cel alone. Similarly, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of axi-cel when administered with atezo were comparable to when the CAR T-cell therapy is administered alone. The timing of atezo administration with respect to CAR T-cell treatment is thought to impact CAR T-cell persistence and requires further investigation. A range of techniques are being employed to further define immune cell subsets and study the tumor microenvironment to better understand the anti-tumor immune response of axi-cel. Furthermore, enhanced knowledge of such parameters may prove prognostically valuable in deciding which patients could benefit from immune-checkpoint blockade alongside CAR T-cell therapy.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox