All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Nurix Therapeutics, Roche, Sobi, and Thermo Fisher Scientific and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
Results from the preplanned 10-year final analysis of the multinational, randomized, open-label, phase III RELEVANCE trial (NCT01476787; NCT01650701), evaluating rituximab + lenalidomide (R2; n = 513) vs rituximab-based immunochemotherapy (R-Chemo; n = 517) in adults with previously untreated Grade 1–3a follicular lymphoma (FL), were published in Blood by Gower et al. Primary endpoints included complete response confirmed/unconfirmed (CR/CRu) rate at 120 weeks and progression-free survival (PFS) by independent review committee (IRC); this long-term analysis allowed for mature assessment of PFS.
Key data: At a median follow-up of 118.2 months, median PFS was comparable between groups at 110.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.4–not reached [NR]) with R2 and 102.8 months (95% CI, 82.8–NR) with R-Chemo (p = 0.80); estimated PFS rates were 46.4% and 46.6%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-next lymphoma treatment (TTNLT) were NR in either group; estimated 10-year OS rates were 82.4% vs 81.1% and estimated 10-year TTNLT rates were 62.2% vs 66.3% for R2 vs R-Chemo. No new safety findings emerged; 1.5% of patients experienced a Grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). The cumulative incidence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) was 2.11 cases per 100 patient-years, with comparable rates in both treatment groups.
Key learning: These long-term data continue to support R2 as a chemotherapy-free first-line treatment strategy for previously untreated advanced FL and may provide a useful benchmark for evaluating emerging non-chemotherapy combinations in this setting.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
In your experience, what is the average vein-to-vein time when treating patients with DLBCL with a reimbursed CAR T-cell therapy (from apheresis to infusion)?