All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL); however, it is often associated with adverse events, including the development of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. There are limited data regarding the impact of CRS development on CAR T-cell therapy efficacy and outcomes.1
The Lymphoma Hub recently reported the impact of bridging therapy on CAR T-cell outcomes in patients with LBCL. Here, we summarize the article published by Bhaskar et al.1 in Blood Advances on the impact of CRS on CAR T-cell outcomes in patients with aggressive LBCL.1
This is a retrospective multicenter study that included patients aged ≥18 years with aggressive LBCL who received either axicabtagene ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel across eight medical centers in the US.
The study outcomes included:
Of the 351 patients who received CAR T cells, 74.4% developed CRS and the remaining 25.5% did not; 57.6% received axicabtagene ciloleucel and 42.5% received tisagenlecleucel. Baseline characteristics in patients with versus without CRS are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics*
Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated) |
Patients with CRS |
Patients without CRS |
p value |
---|---|---|---|
Median age (range), years |
61 (18–88) |
65 (37–85) |
0.005 |
Sex |
|
|
0.895 |
Male |
66 |
66.7 |
|
Female |
34 |
33.3 |
|
Stage |
|
|
0.893 |
I–II |
19.5 |
18.9 |
|
III or IV |
80.5 |
81.1 |
|
IPI score |
|
|
0.226 |
1–2 |
46.6 |
54.5 |
|
≥3 |
53.4 |
45.5 |
|
Disease status |
|
|
0.14 |
Primary refractory |
37.6 |
21.8 |
|
Refractory |
33.9 |
34.6 |
|
Relapsed |
28.6 |
43.6 |
|
Bulky disease |
|
|
0.330 |
Yes |
18.4 |
13.5 |
|
No |
81.6 |
86.5 |
|
CAR T-cell product |
|
|
<0.001 |
Axi-cel |
69.7 |
22.2 |
<0.001 |
Tisa-cel |
30.3 |
77.8 |
|
Peak ferritin, >5000 |
|
|
<0.001 |
Yes |
17.8 |
1.3 |
|
No |
82.2 |
98.7 |
|
LDH>ULN |
|
|
<0.001 |
Yes |
62 |
36.9 |
|
No |
32 |
63.1 |
|
Received steroids |
|
|
<0.001 |
Yes |
46.2 |
4.8 |
|
No |
53.8 |
95.1 |
|
Received tocilizumab |
|
|
<0.001 |
Yes |
59.5 |
12.4 |
|
No |
40.5 |
87.6 |
|
Received bridging therapy |
|
|
0.227 |
Yes |
65.3 |
72.4 |
|
No |
34.6 |
27.6 |
|
axi-cel, axicabtagene ciloleucel; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; IPI, international prognostic index; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; tisa-cel, tisagenlecleucel; ULN, upper limit of normal. |
At a median follow-up of 30 months, there were no significant differences in the PFS or OS between patients who developed CRS and those who did not.
Multivariate analyses revealed that development of CRS, disease stage (Stage III-IV vs Stage I–II), disease status, or receipt of steroid treatments did not significantly impact PFS or OS; however, a peak ferritin level of >5000 within 28 days following CAR T-cell infusion, and lactate dehydrogenase before the start of lymphodepleting chemotherapy greater than the institutional upper limit of normal was significantly associated with a worse PFS or OS (p < 0.01). Moreover, the presence of bulky disease was significantly associated with a worse OS (p = 0.005), and receipt of bridging therapy was associated with a shorter PFS (p = 0.011).
At 30 days post CAR T-cell infusion, there was no difference in objective response rate (p = 0.081) and complete response rate (p = 0.155) between patients who developed CRS and those who did not (Figure 1), or across CRS severity (Figure 2). Further to this, the development of CRS within 28 days was significantly associated with cytopenia at Day 30 (p = 0.001); however, no association between CRS and cytopenia was observed at later time points.
Figure 1. Response rates in patients with vs without CRS*
CRR, complete response rate; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ORR, overall response rate.
*Data from Bhaskar, et al.1
Figure 2. Response rates in patients with no CRS, Grade 1–2 CRS, and Grade ≥3 CRS*
CRR, complete response rate; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ORR, overall response rate.
*Data from Bhaskar, et al.1
This retrospective analysis showed that patients with aggressive LBCL treated with CD19-directed CAR T cells who develop CRS yield similar objective response, complete response, OS, and PFS outcomes to those who do not develop CRS. Similar to previous findings, the development of CRS was not shown to impact CAR T-cell efficacy; therefore, it is imperative not to discount CAR T-cells early in those who do not develop CRS, and the decision to initiate additional lymphoma-directed therapy post-CAR T-cell therapy should not be based on the development of CRS.
Although the development of CRS did not influence CAR T-cell outcomes, this study highlighted other factors that can impact survival outcomes, such as peak ferritin level of >5000 within 28 days of CAR T-cell infusion, lactate dehydrogenase greater than the upper limit of normal, presence of bulky disease, and receipt of bridging therapy.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox