The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
Featured:
The Lymphoma Hub and Multiple Myeloma were pleased to speak to Anna Sureda, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, ES. We asked, What is the rationale for monitoring secondary malignancies after B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy?
What is the rationale for monitoring secondary malignancies after BCMA and CD19 CAR T-cell therapy?
In this interview, Anna Sureda discusses the latest data on the incidence of secondary malignancies after treatment with CAR T-cell therapies, sharing their insight on the implications of these data for clinical practice. Sureda shares considerations for CAR T-cell treatments, including the importance of balancing therapeutic benefits with potential implications for the development of secondary malignancies.
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content