All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Caribou Biosciences, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Nurix Therapeutics, Roche, Sobi and Thermo Fisher Scientific and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
Results from the global, randomized, double-blind, phase III frontMIND trial (NCT04824092), investigating tafasitamab + lenalidomide (Tafa-Len) added to rituximab + cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine + prednisone (R-CHOP) vs R-CHOP alone in 899 patients aged 18–80 years with previously untreated high-intermediate-risk or high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL), were published in The Lancet by Lenz et al. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).
Key data: At a median follow-up of 35.2 months, Tafa-Len-R-CHOP significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death vs R-CHOP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59–0.96; p = 0.0194), with 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 71.1% vs 62.9%. In a predefined subgroup analysis, HRs for PFS were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.36–0.95) in the activated B-cell (ABC)-like cell-of-origin subtype and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.40–1.19) in the germinal centre B-cell (GCB)-like subtypes. EFS was also significantly improved with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64–0.97; p = 0.0260), while median OS was not reached (NR) in either arm (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.63–1.14; p = 0.2703). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were more frequent with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP (87% vs 76%); the most common Grade ≥3 TEAEs were neutropenia (69% vs 58%), thrombocytopenia (27% vs 14%), anemia (24% vs 16%), and febrile neutropenia (16% vs 13%). Fatal TEAEs occurred in 6% vs 4% of patients; however, the overall number of deaths in the study was lower with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP (19% vs 22%).
Key learning: Tafa-Len-R-CHOP significantly improved PFS and EFS vs R-CHOP in previously untreated high-risk DLBCL or HGBL, with PFS advantages observed in several subgroups analysed, representing a potential new first-line treatment option for these patient populations. As expected from the addition of Tafa-Len to R-CHOP, rates of TEAEs were increased, but this did not impair R-CHOP dosing or scheduling.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
In patients with R/R LBCL who progress after CAR‑T, which of the following data would most strengthen your confidence in considering BV+R2?