The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can improve outcomes for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, patients with rapid progressive disease at lymphodepletion have poor outcomes.1 The addition of checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 to CAR T-cell therapy may improve outcomes in patients with DLBCL.1
During the 50th Annual Meeting of the EBMT, Amit presented final results from a phase II trial (NCT05385263) investigating the addition of nivolumab, a checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1, to CAR T-cell therapy in patients with DLBCL with progressive disease.1 Below, we summarize the key findings.
In the nivolumab group, 50% of patients experienced post-nivolumab cytokine-release syndrome (Table 1).
Table 1. Toxicity profile*
Domain, % |
All patients (n = 20) |
Patients receiving nivolumab (n = 12) |
Patients’ ineligible for nivolumab (n = 8) |
CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICAHT, immune effector cell–associated hematotoxicity; ICANS, immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome; IEC-HS, immune effector cell–associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome; IgG, immunoglobulin G; NRM, non-relapse mortality. †All Grade 1–2 CRS. |
|||
Overall CRS |
85 |
75 |
100 |
Grade 3–4 CRS |
20 |
17 |
25 |
Overall ICANS |
20 |
8 |
38 |
Grade 3–4 ICANS |
10 |
0 |
25 |
Post nivolumab CRS/ICANS |
N/A |
50%† |
N/A |
Grade 3–4 ICAHT |
|||
Early |
15 |
8 |
25 |
Late |
5 |
8 |
0 |
Overall IEC-HS |
10 |
8 |
13 |
Grade 3–4 IEC-HS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Patients with infections by 3 months |
10 |
17 |
0 |
Patients with IgG <3.5 gr/L |
30 |
33 |
25 |
NRM at 1 month |
5 |
0 |
13 |
Figure 1. 6- and 12-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates*
*Data from Amit1
Key learnings |
|
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content