All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Nurix Therapeutics, Roche, Sobi and Thermo Fisher Scientific and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly and Pfizer. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
Results from the international, phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled inMIND trial (NCT04680052) evaluating tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide + rituximab vs placebo + lenalidomide + rituximab in 548 patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) were recently published in The Lancet by Sehn et al. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and key secondary endpoints included positron emission tomography-complete response (PET-CR) rate in the fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid population (defined as the proportion of patients achieving a complete metabolic response at any time after the start of treatment among patients with a positive baseline PET scan) and overall survival (OS).
Key data: The addition of tafasitamab to lenalidomide + rituximab resulted in longer median PFS vs placebo (22.4 months vs 13.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32–0.58; p < 0.0001). Among patients with FDG-avid disease at baseline (tafasitamab + lenalidomide + rituximab, n = 251; placebo + lenalidomide + rituximab, n = 254), the PET-CR rate was higher with tafasitamab than with placebo (49% vs 40%; odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.04–2.13; p = 0.029). In the intention-to-treat population, the best overall response rate (ORR) was improved with tafasitamab vs placebo (84% vs 72%; OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.30–3.02; p = 0.0014). A full analysis of OS is planned at 5 years of follow-up. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between groups and aligned with expectations for the patient population.
Key learning: Tafasitamab combined with lenalidomide + rituximab demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS with manageable toxicity in patients with R/R FL, representing a potential new standard-of-care treatment option.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content