All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche and sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte and Lilly. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Latest updates from the phase III STARGLO trial: 2L and 3L+ data

By Dylan Barrett

Share:

Featured:

Charles HerbauxCharles Herbaux

Oct 6, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to recall key efficacy and safety outcomes for glofitamab in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for the treatment of R/R DLBCL.


Do you know... Based on the post-hoc analysis from the STARGLO trial, which of the following statements is likely to be true in patients with DLBCL?

The Lymphoma Hub was pleased to speak to Charles Herbaux, University of Montpellier, FR. Herbaux discussed the latest updates from the phase III STARGLO trial (NCT04408638) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with a focus on second-line (2L) and third-line+ (3L+) data. 

Latest updates from the phase III STARGLO trial: 2L and 3L+ data

Key points1 

  • The 2:1 randomized, global, phase III STARGLO trial assessed the efficacy and safety of glofitamab (Glofit) + gemcitabine + oxaliplatin (GemOx) vs rituximab (R)-GemOx in patients with R/R DLBCL with ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy.
  • Patients with one prior line of therapy must be ineligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT).
  • In the primary analysis, Glofit-GemOx improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the complete response (CR) rate vs R-GemOx.
  • An extended follow-up post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety outcomes in the STARGLO trial in patients with 1 or ≥2 prior lines of therapy.
  • After a median follow-up of 24.7 months, Glofit-GemOx demonstrated a clinically meaningful OS, PFS, and CR benefit vs R-GemOx, irrespective of the number of prior lines of therapy.
  • Glofit-GemOx improved the median OS vs R-GemOx in 2L patients (not reached vs 15.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40–1.02) and 3L+ patients (18.3 months vs 6.7 months; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34–0.95).
  • Median PFS was longer with Glofti-GemOx vs R-GemOx in 2L patients (25.0 months vs 5.6 months; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32–0.83) and 3L patients (9.2 months vs 2.0 months; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24–0.66).
  • The CR rates were higher with Glofit-GemOx vs R-GemOx in both 2L patients (63.5% vs 28.1%) and 3L patients (50.0% vs 20.6%).
  • Results suggest that Glofit-GemOx offers higher efficacy outcomes in earlier lines of therapy.
  • In terms of safety data, there were higher rates of infectious events in patients treated with Glofit-GemOx vs R-GemOx.
  • It is important to assess whether a patient with R/R DLBCL is eligible for, or has access to, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy; for patients who cannot receive CAR T-cell therapy, these results suggest that Glofit-GemOx is a strong option after one or more lines of therapy.  

This educational resource is independently supported by Roche. All content is developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders are allowed no influence on the content of this resource. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In your experience, when do most CRS/ICANS events occur after lisocabtagene maraleucel infusion?