All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Pola, an antibody–drug conjugate targeting CD79b, was approved by the FDA in combination with R-CHP for the treatment of patients with untreated DLBCL based on results from the POLARIX trial (NCT03274492). POLARIX is a phase III, randomized trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of Pola in combination with R-CHP (Pola-R-CHP; ITT, n = 500; safety evaluable, n = 495) vs standard of care (R-CHOP; ITT, n = 500; safety evaluable, n = 498) as first-line treatment for patients with DLBCL. The Lymphoma Hub has previously covered the primary results, descriptive analysis outcomes, safety and efficacy in elderly patients, Asian population analysis, and Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOEP outcomes from the trial. Here, we summarize the 5-years results presented at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition by Gilles Salles.1 |
Key learnings |
At the 5-year follow-up, PFS remained significantly improved with Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP (64.9% vs 59.1%). |
The 5-year DFS and OS rates were also higher with Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP at 71.8 vs 66.5% and 82.3% vs 79.5%, respectively. |
The safety profiles of Pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP were comparable, with similar rates of any grade and Grade 3–5 AEs, including any grade peripheral neuropathy (50.3% vs 52.4%) and infections (47.9% vs 44.0%). The difference in hematologic toxicities was <5% between arms. |
Long-term data from the POLARIX trial demonstrate deep and durable efficacy of Pola-R-CHP, with sustained and significant PFS and DFS benefits vs R-CHOP and a comparable safety profile, supporting its use in patients with intermediate- or high-risk untreated DLBCL. |
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; DFS, disease-free survival; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; ITT, intention to treat; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; Pola-R-CHP, polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-prednisone; R-CHOP, rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-and prednisone.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox