All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

What do the 3-year follow-up results from the STARGLO trial tell us about Glofit-GemOx in R/R DLBCL?

By Dylan Barrett

Share:

Featured:

Christopher P. FoxChristopher P. Fox

Sep 24, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to recall key efficacy and safety outcomes for glofitamab in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.


Do you know... Based on the 3-year follow-up results from the STARGLO trial, by approximately what percentage was the risk of death reduced with Glofit-GemOx vs R-GemOx in patients with R/R DLBCL?

The Lymphoma Hub was pleased to speak with Christopher P. Fox, University of Nottingham, UK. We asked, What do the 3-year follow-up results from the STARGLO trial tell us about Glofit + GemOx in R/R DLBCL? 

What do the 3-year follow-up results from the STARGLO trial tell us about Glofit-GemOx in R/R DLBCL?

In this interview, Fox discusses the 3-year follow-up results from the global, randomized, phase III STARGLO trial (NCT04408638) of glofitamab (Glofit) + gemcitabine + oxaliplatin (GemOx) (n = 183) vs rituximab (R)-GemOx (n = 91) in transplant-ineligible patients with R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), recently published in Blood Advances. He also explores outcomes across clinically relevant subgroups. 

Key points

  • Primary results from the STARGLO trial suggested an overall survival (OS) benefit with Glofit-GemOx in transplant-ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL.1 
  • Updated results, with a median OS follow-up of 35.1 months, show that Glofit-GemOx continued to demonstrate superior OS vs R-GemOx, with a median OS of 25.5 months vs 12.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4–0.8).2
  • Glofit-GemOx also improved complete response (CR) rates (58.5% vs 25.3%) and 30-month progression-free survival rates (38.1% vs 15.2%) vs R-GemOx.2  
  • Among patients treated in the second-line setting, the CR rate was 63.5% with Glofit-GemOx vs 28.1% with R-GemOx, and median OS was not reached with Glofit-GemOx vs 14.4 months with R-GemOx.2
  • Among patients with primary refractory disease or early treatment relapse, the CR rates were 56.0% and 16.7% in the Glofit-GemOx and R-GemOx groups, respectively, with 3-year OS rates of 46.1% and 16.5%, respectively.2
  • Glofit-GemOx demonstrated comparable efficacy outcomes across age subgroups, including patients aged ≥75 years.2
    • The rate of any grade cytokine release syndrome was slightly higher among patients aged ≥75 years (52.4% vs 44.8% for the overall Glofit-exposed population).2
  • Overall, the safety profile was manageable, with no new safety signals and no evidence of cumulative toxicity or new long-term adverse events observed.2
  • These data suggest that Glofit-GemOx is associated with high response rates, durable remissions, and prolonged survival, with a manageable safety profile, in transplant-ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL. Benefits were observed across subgroups, including patients with early treatment failure, as well as patients aged ≥75 years, subgroups representing patients with high unmet medical needs. 
  • Results support the use of Glofit-GemOx, an off-the-shelf therapy, as a treatment option for transplant-ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL. 

This educational resource is independently supported by Roche. All content is developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders are allowed no influence. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In practice, what is the most common reason you discontinue rituximab maintenance after BR in older patients with previously untreated MCL?