All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Caribou Biosciences, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Nurix Therapeutics, Roche, Sobi and Thermo Fisher Scientific and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

EHA 2026 | What are the key findings from the phase I ANTLER trial in R/R B-cell NHL?

Share:

Jun 17, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to recall key findings from the phase I ANTLER trial of vispa-cel for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.


Do you know... Which B-cell marker does vispacabtagene regedleucel (vispa-cel) target?

During the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE, the Lymphoma Hub was pleased to speak with Stephen Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, US. We asked, What are the key findings from the phase I ANTLER trial in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)? 

EHA 2026 | What are the key findings from the phase I ANTLER trial in R/R B-cell NHL?

Key points1 

  • The phase I ANTLER trial (NCT04637763) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vispacabtagene regedleucel (vispa-cel), an allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy with PD-1 gene knock-out, in patients with R/R B-cell NHL, and to determine the recommended phase II dose (N = 85). 
  • The recommended phase II dose was found to be 80 million cells. 
  • The safety profile was generally manageable; any-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 54% of patients, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in 14%, infections in 53%, and immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS) in 2%. 
    • Grade ≥3 CRS, ICANS, infections, prolonged cytopenias, and IEC-HS occurred in 1%, 4%, 26%, 27%, and 2% of patients, respectively. 
    • No graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was observed, and six Grade 5 adverse events occurred. 
  • Within the optimized cohort – patients with second- or third-line large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who received T cells from younger donors (aged <30 years) with ≥2 donor–recipient matched human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles (n = 35) – deep and durable responses were observed, consistent with reported outcomes for approved autologous CAR T-cell therapies. 
    • The overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were 83% and 66%, respectively; median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.1 months, and median duration of response (DoR) was not reached. 
    • In patients with T cells from older donors (aged ≥30 years with <2 donor–recipient matched HLA alleles), outcomes were poorer, with a median PFS of 2.5 months. 
  • In the second-line confirmatory LBCL cohort (donor–recipient matching ≥2 HLA alleles, donor aged <30 years, RP2D of vispa-cel) (n = 27), the ORR was 82% and the CR rate was 67%. 
    • Median PFS was 17.1 months and DoR was 16.2 months. 
  • These findings suggest vispa-cel has potential as an accessible, off-the-shelf, second-line therapy for patients with LBCL, and that it may also have feasibility for outpatient administration. 
  • A phase III randomized controlled pivotal trial of vispa-cel as a second-line treatment in patients with LBCL who are ineligible for both autologous CAR T-cell therapy and transplant is planned. 

This educational resource is independently supported by Caribou Biosciences. All content is developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders are allowed no influence  

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

What is the primary reason you use bridging therapy in patients with DLBCL awaiting CAR T-cell therapy?